(This is a more or less a TODO list for my Debian packages and other stuff I’m working on) Already done New package: metatheme-gilouche Today I uploaded the new package metatheme-gilouche, which builds the binary package gnome-theme-gilouche. The Gilouche theme has been created by openSUSE and is used there as the default theme in GNOME. For users of gnome-app-install, this theme provides a “better” style for your main menu. It contains icons (replacing industrial-icon-theme), GTK+, and Metacity themes. ... Read more 》

Looking at the amd64 CD images of Lenny, I just saw that there is the package ‘gnome’ on disk 1, while some of its dependencies are on disk 2. I don’t think that this is good. Same also applies to K3B on disk 3, and openoffice.org-kde on KDE-disk 1. In my opinion, all packages which are located on a disk X, should only depend on a disk N (N<X). This means that the package gnome would be moved to disk 2, or its dependencies to disk 1. ... Read more 》

Much happened since the last time I wrote about debimg. The project is now registered on Alioth and has a mailing list. On the code side, there have also been several changes. First of all, the repository module has been merged into the master branch. This was the first step towards the creation of the image building, which happened today by introducing the ‘image’ module. The code should be treated as Beta quality, but the project as a whole is Alpha, because the application utilizing debimg. ... Read more 》

While most of the bindings are LGPL licensed, modules like pygst are licensed under the terms of the GPL-2+. This means, together with the fact that you need to use pygst for any application wishing to use these binding, that you can not create proprietary or non-GPL-compatible programs using the GStreamer Python bindings. You can read more about this in the Debian Bug Tracker in Bug#516190. I expect that this should be forwarded to upstream but I haven’t checked their bug tracker yet. ... Read more 》

As I wrote Monday in “debimg core example”, I have an extended version which creates a repository. The problem on Monday was that the code was not far enough to be published. Not much has changed yet, but I considered to create a temporary branch temp/repository to be able to show you the example, and to give you an impression of what the final API will look like (it’s not complete yet, trust me). ... Read more 》

The following example demonstrates the features of debimg core, and how it can be used to fetch a some packages. As you will see when you run this example, debimg uses SHA1 filenames for the downloaded files. This may be changed in a future version. There is also an improved version of this example, which creates a repository, but the needed module (debimg.core.repository) is not public yet, because its far from being finished. ... Read more 》

Today, I have published the first pieces of debimg 0.1. The published code includes the resolver, the compression module and the fetcher module. It is rewritten from scratch, this time with a PEP8-conforming style, and more flexible. Because debimg.core does not depend on any specific configuration format, but is configured solely via parameters, it is more flexible than debimg 0.0. This new code enables people to write their own programs related to Debian images easily. ... Read more 》

You can not use codenames for pinning packages to a specific release. Everything like this just fails, and can result in apt not finding any candidate for a package. You can see this for example in Bug#512318, and Bug#513864 seems to be related to that one. If you want to target Lenny and you don’t have Etch in your sources.list, pin stable at a higher priority than testing. This means that the pin automatically migrates once Lenny becomes stable (which happens hopefully in 2 weeks). ... Read more 》

Well, I wrote** 2599 lines** of documentation. More detailed I wrote 2599 lines of documentation from Thursday to Sunday. In total, the jak branch of python-apt now has a diffstat (compared to debian-sid) of: Changes: 113 files changed, 5845 insertions (+), 2763 deletions(-) Partly responsible is Ben Finney, whose patches I merged. I also closed 7 bugs not relevant anymore in current versions of python-apt. This is the changelog to from debian-sid to jak: ... Read more 》

News: http://bzr.debian.org/loggerhead/users/jak/python-apt/jak/revision/219 introduced again some new documentation. doc/source/apt/debfile.rst | 6 doc/source/apt_pkg/cache.rst | 540 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- doc/source/apt_pkg/index.rst | 24 + doc/source/conf.py | 5 doc/source/examples/cache-packages.py | 22 + doc/source/examples/cache-pkgfile.py | 29 + doc/source/examples/missing-deps.py | 51 +++ 7 files changed, 659 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) You can see them at http://people.debian.org/~jak/python-apt-doc/ Missing seem to be: AcquireFile AcquireItem ActionGroup Configuration MetaIndex PackageIndexFile PkgManager PkgRecords PkgSourceList PkgSrcRecords ProblemResolver TagFile TagSection But the weekend is not over yet. I will blog tomorrow again, and once I’m finished with everything (which may be tomorrow, too). ... Read more 》