In the past weeks, I was looking at several build systems. As it turned out, there is not a single sane generic build system out there.
Autotools: Autotools are ugly, slow, and require an immense amount of code copies in the source tree.
WAF: WAF is not as ugly as autools and it’s faster and does not generate Makefiles or stuff like this. But it has serious issues: It requires one to copy it to the source tarball, has no stable API, and requires Python for building. Furthermore, support for unit testing is broken: It runs the unit tests, but does not abort the build process if the tests fail and does not display why the tests fail.
CMake: The syntax is ugly, it generates Makefiles, and support for pkg-config seems to be very very basic.
So how should a build system look like?
* It should be installed in the system and not require code copies in the source tree (and thus no pre-build actions)
* It should not generate Makefiles, but build the project itself.
* It should not require more than a standard C library.
* It should support pkg-config out of the box.
* It should support SONAMEs for libraries.
* It should detect dependencies on headers automatically.
* It should support unit testing and abort if the tests fail.
* It should not require developers to specify how to do things, only what to do.
So, why is there no sane build system?
Reactions from Mastodon